Is this ruby metaprogramming abuse? -


I'm new to Ruby, and there is a gem that I want to chat with the JSNRPC API and basically all Calls and responses are quite similar, that each API call can be handled with a function such as:

Module :: API_Order ('APINapspace.Namespace Math') < / P>

But I also want to be able to (for convenience):

Module :: APIINA Space Namespace method

There is no reason to do this by using Module.const_missing to return a dummy class to a method_masing that is the module :: APINamespace.NamespaceMethod to Module :: api_command ('APINamespace.NamespaceMethod') will allow the call to pass

Is there any more elegant or decent way to do this? ?

Yes, I'm sorry, but this is the hack in my mind ridiculous First of all, I'm assuming that your api_command method is actually implementing methods on the APINamespace module, as this line Contains: Module :: API_Order ('APINapspace.Namespace Method')

Looking at the above, why not include APINamespace in your module Set equal steady? 

  MyModule :: APINamespace = :: APIspace MimeModule :: APIINS Space. Namespace Method ()

Update:

I still do not understand my position completely, but perhaps it is: 

  Module MyModule def self.const_missing (c) Object.const_get (c) End End

Now you can apply any top-level stability As if it was defined on your module; It is said that there was a module called StrangeAPI at the top level, if you use the hack above, you can now implement its methods: 

  MyModule :: Strange API Blah ()

Do you want it?


Comments

Post a Comment